Publication Details
Abstract
Public–private partnership (PPP) strategies require a framework that connects investment decisions with service outcomes, risk allocation and long-term fiscal commitments. This article develops a strategic management model by integrating international governance guidance with a reproducible reassessment of an expert-rating dataset contained in the author’s underlying research material. The study combines documentary analysis, institutional comparison, within-expert ranking, tie-adjusted Kendall concordance and an illustrative multicriteria assessment. Ten experts assessed five criteria: risk and responsibility, private investment share, coordination, value for money, and monitoring and oversight. Recalculation yields Kendall’s W = 0.7494. Monitoring and oversight receive the largest rank-derived weight (0.2867), followed by value for money (0.2767). Using the source’s rounded weights, corrected illustrative scores are 0.8700 for alternative A, 0.7625 for C and 0.3725 for B. The proposed model supplements this ranking with mandatory checks for economic justification, fiscal affordability, defensible risk allocation and contractual service requirements. It also separates financial reporting, fiscal statistics and public disclosure. The contribution is a transparent decision architecture suitable for subsequent testing in Uzbekistan; the small expert panel and hypothetical alternatives do not establish causal effectiveness or a universally optimal PPP form.